Search for: "Leon v. Martinez" Results 41 - 60 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2020, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Those documents “conclusively establish[] a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law” (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“With regard to the first cause of action, Izmirligil failed to state a cause of action under Real Property Law § 329 against the BNYM defendants and Chase (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Viewing the complaint in the· light most favorable to the plaintiff (see Leon v Martinez,84 NY2d at 87-88), it fails to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendants’ alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome in the underlying medical malpractice action or that plaintiff would not hav~ incurred any damages (see Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo,… [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These allegations are further supported by plaintiff’s affidavit and the attached documents (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY2d 633, 635-636 [1976]). [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Given the vague, speculative, and conclusory nature of these allegations, plaintiffs failed to allege facts that “fit into any cognizable legal theory” (see Nonnon v City of New York, 9 NY3d 825, 827 [2007], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:38 am by José Guillermo
COMUNICADO COMISIÓN ESPECIAL PARA LA ELECCIÓN DE MIEMBROS DE LA JNJ PUBLICA LA LISTA DE POSTULANTES VÁLIDAMENTE INSCRITOS La Comisión Especial cumple con la publicación de la lista de los postulantes válidamente inscritos, de acuerdo con los plazos establecidos en el cronograma del Concurso Público de Méritos para la selección de miembros de la Junta Nacional de Justicia. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accepting as true the facts set forth in the complaint and according plaintiff the benefit of all favorable inferences arising therefrom, as we must in the context of the instant motion (see generally Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), we conclude that the complaint fails to plead a cognizable theory for legal malpractice because plaintiff’s allegations do not support even an inference that any alleged negligence by defendants was a proximate cause of… [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We find that the motion court’s dismissal of the counterclaims was proper and that defendants have not articulated any basis to disturb the motion court’s ruling (Leon v Martinez , 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bluth is the rare case in which the solemn statements of Leon v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Co. of New York, 98 NY 314, 326 [2002]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 1994]). [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88). [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit and supporting evidence, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83), the complaint failed to allege that the defendants acted “with intent to deceive the court or any party” (Judiciary Law § 487[1]; see Fleyshman v Suckle & Schlesinger, PLLC, 91 AD3d 591, 592-593; Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160,… [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“On a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211, the pleading is to be given a liberal construction, the allegations contained within it are assumed to be true and the plaintiff is to be afforded every favorable inference” (Simkin v Blank, 19 NY3d 46, 52; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Hershco v Gordon & Gordon, 155 AD3d 1007, 1008). [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, in support of that branch of their motion which sought dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the Lyubarskys failed to sustain their burden of submitting documentary evidence to resolve all factual issues as a matter of law, and conclusively dispose of the plaintiff’s fraud cause of action as it related to the common areas of the building (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87; Camisa v Papaleo, 93 AD3d at 625). [read post]