Search for: "Lewis v. Mains" Results 41 - 60 of 288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
Two pumps are located on the main Wellton canal near the lateral canal split that supplies water to fields of the suspect farm; one gasoline powered pump on a trailer and one permanent electric pump with an attached hose. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Lewis, which evaluated whether: (1) “the directors are disinterested and independent” or (2) “the challenged transaction was otherwise the product of a valid business judgment. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 6:33 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 6:07 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-law, Editor, First Reference In Hunsley v Canadian Energy Services LP, 2020 ABQB 724 (CanLII) (“Hunsley”), the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench (“ABQB”) found that a wrongfully dismissed employee was entitled to receive his regular pay and benefits during his notice period despite the reality that the employer had reduced compensation for employees during a pandemic pay cut. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:04 am by Rose Hughes
Claim 1 of the Main Request on appeal related to the use of α-synuclein (α-SN) fragments or anti-α-synuclein antibodies to treat or protect against Lewy Body disease, particularly Parkinson's disease. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:00 am by Elin Hofverberg
Most Sami voters live either in Norrbotten or Västerbotten. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:42 am by Cyberleagle
This proposal differed from offline duties of care in two main respects: First, the White Paper did not limit or define the notion of harm. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:53 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Studen-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]