Search for: "Lewis v. Texas"
Results 41 - 60
of 611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
The 1998, Austin Court of Appeals opinion in the case styled, "Great Texas County Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:57 am
On November 9 the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in National Meat Association v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:54 am
In TEC Olmos, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:20 pm
At issue in Southwest Royalties, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 12:47 pm
Hegar v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 8:56 am
Maersk Line, Limited, In Personam, and M/V Maersk Idaho, No. 3:19-CV-238, 2023 WL 113740 (S.D. [read post]
23 May 2014, 7:53 am
Morrell Masonry Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:40 pm
The second case, Lewis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:18 am
BP America Production Company v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:18 am
BP America Production Company v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 2:58 pm
Liskow & Lewis attorney Butch Marseglia submitted an amicus curiae brief on behalf of The Texas Oil & Gas Association. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:23 am
The Texas Supreme Court recently released its opinion in Van Dyke v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
The style of this Federal case is, David Lewis Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am
While Texas currently has “primacy” (approval from the EPA for permitting and enforcement authority) over issuing permits for wells in Classes I-V, it does not yet have primacy for wells in Class VI, which means that final authorization still comes from the EPA. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am
While Texas currently has “primacy” (approval from the EPA for permitting and enforcement authority) over issuing permits for wells in Classes I-V, it does not yet have primacy for wells in Class VI, which means that final authorization still comes from the EPA. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am
While Texas currently has “primacy” (approval from the EPA for permitting and enforcement authority) over issuing permits for wells in Classes I-V, it does not yet have primacy for wells in Class VI, which means that final authorization still comes from the EPA. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:17 am
Baze v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:16 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:10 am
In Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC v. 1776 Energy Partners, LLC, — S.W.3d —, No. 22-0095, 2023 WL 3556695 (Tex. 2023), the Texas Supreme Court held that, as a matter of law, the operator of a joint operating agreement, Ovintiv, did not owe interest on production payments owed to the non-operator, 1776 Energy, that Ovintiv withheld until a separate lawsuit involving 1776 Energy was resolved by the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
