Search for: "Liebman v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
And Fisher notes that Stevens hinted this Term in his United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:12 pm
The decision is New Process Steel v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:08 am
The United States Supreme Court today handed down its long-awaited decision in New Process Steel L.P. v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 am
" Liebman clerked for Justice Stevens in the Court's 1978-79 term. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
Below is an essay for our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens by James Liebman, the Simon H. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:04 am
On March 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in New Process Steel v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm
This has resulted in a backlog of unresolved cases pending before the NLRB and in a case pending before the United States Supreme Court calling for the Supreme Court to decide whether the National Labor Relations Act permits the NLRB to act when there are only two sitting members of the NLRB, New Process Steel v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:00 am
" Liebman has been a member of the NLRB since 1997. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm
An AFL-CIO Blog post states: "As an NLRB member over the past eight years, Liebman has challenged the Bush administration’s war on workers. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:29 am
In Ricci v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:01 am
Supreme Court, in Furman v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:19 pm
As Liebman and Zeckhauser remind us, "we must design systems for mere mortals, not the people who inhabit the models of traditional economists. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Last week, ALDF invited our supporters to send in questions about United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:02 am
[Editor: In Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
The judge, applying NLRB v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Chairman Liebman concurred in the denial of the motion for reconsideration for the reasons stated in footnotes 5 and 8 of the Board's Order denying the special appeals. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 12:31 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:27 pm
I also thought it would be useful to consider what measures could have been undertaken to prevent the misunderstandings that led to the 3M v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Strang v. [read post]
