Search for: "Lippman .v Lippman" Results 41 - 60 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm by Brian Shiffrin
" Then, Chief Judge Lippman wrote that there is no material difference between the California statute struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]) "and our persistent felony offender sentencing statutes. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:00 am by ADeStefano
In Fabrizi v. 1095Ave/ of the Arms LLC, plaintiff was injured when a conduit pipe fell on his hand. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:53 am
CIVIL PROCEDURE - JURY POLLING - HARMLESS ERROR ANALYSISDuffy v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:16 am by Brian Shiffrin
Judges Ciparick wrote a dissent, in which Chief Judge Lippman joined urging that the deterrent purpose of the exclusionary rule should be applicable to identity-related evidence. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:42 pm
Luckily, in Lifson, Judge Lippman rectified an unfair and unjustified result from the lower Court, and a new jury will now decide the Lifson case. [read post]