Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED April 20, 2010" Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. [read post]
(The Second Circuit's opinion was redacted in part to preserve the government's ability to seek further judicial review.) [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 3:38 pm
Bronx Probate Lawyers said on August 12, 2010, after over a year of estate litigation regarding the validity of the July 11, 2000 will, when it became apparent that the Objectants were about to file an Estate Administration petition, the Executor suddenly located and filed a third will of the decedent, dated October 20, 2005. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
On or about April 20, 2013, [he] submitted to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (`USCIS’) in Australia an I–130 Form on behalf of [his wife]. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
  This timing compares to the first bladder cancer “claim [being] made known to the company” in September, 2010; and “the first bladder lawsuit was filed during the summer of July 2011. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
One thing that has become increasingly clear in the four months since the Court granted review of the new group of cases is that this is not likely to result in a decision nearly as big as industry groups and other challengers had hoped when they filed nine wide-ranging petitions for review, the latest in a continuing series of protests claiming that the EPA is operating as a rogue agency. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:17 pm by Florian Mueller
But the anonymous requester(s) kept fighting for a more comprehensive review and filed a petition. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles: Qualifying… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles: Qualifying… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles: Qualifying… [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
Timely filed means filed within the H-1B acceptance period beginning April 1, 2012. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Both the list of posts and the posts themselves are listed in chronological order within each section of the book. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
In April 2009, the mother commenced an  action seeking sole legal and residential custody of the child, and an order compelling the father to pay child support. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
Timely filed means filed within the H-1B acceptance period beginning April 1, 2012. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm by Steve Davies
We further concluded that petitioners’ OCSLA Section 20 argument was “wholly without merit. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Each party waived any interest in the other's law license and released or discharged any debts or further claims against the other. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:24 am
Timely filed means filed within the H-1B acceptance period beginning April 1, 2012. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
Each party waived any interest in the other's law license and released or discharged any debts or further claims against the other. [read post]