Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 15, 2013."
Results 41 - 60
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2016, 5:29 pm
A method for petitioning that focuses on administrative obligation was suggested--and it was an excellent part of the report--but the solutions were oriented toward mechanics that might have been more helpful had they been better contextualized (e.g., on my review of the new foreign NGO law). [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Petition for review after the court of appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
Events Please let us know if there are any events you would like to be included on this list by email: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Rueda then timely filed his notice of appeal. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
In the letter, dated January 5, 2012, [Zahorik] informed Donoho that he filed an `Identity Theft/Fraud complaint’ with his local police department due to the recommendation of the FTC. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
In order to see this we need to focus on plural marriage as a lived social reality. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
In January 2011, the deputy sheriffs proposed a two day rodeo. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
In January 2011, the deputy sheriffs proposed a two day rodeo. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:17 pm
But the anonymous requester(s) kept fighting for a more comprehensive review and filed a petition. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
The Court of Appeal denied the County’s writ petition. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Both the list of posts and the posts themselves are listed in chronological order within each section of the book. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Salla, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2013 WL 1681220 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:56 pm
District Court Judge James Robertson granting Slahi’s habeas corpus petition and ordering his release. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
