Search for: "Little v. U.s.*"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,218
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a set of stay applications, consolidated under the caption Ohio v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:24 pm
Chestek at 8 (Quoting JEM Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Good afternoon. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:17 am
In Taggart v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
" Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:50 am
Q v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
It'll come as little surprise to most Balkinization readers that I agree that Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021, as well as his other efforts to scuttle the 2020 election results (and other acts, as well), were high crimes or misdemeanors that warranted conviction and his disqualification from holding future federal office, whether or not his conduct amounted to engaging in an insurrection. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:42 pm
In the relevant case, Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In the arguments, the justices focused little on the facts of the current case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
A Con Law Exam Featuring A Barter Ban, Discrimination Against an AroAce Couple, and Campaign Finance
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Both Jenkins and Fieldcrest are asexual and aromantic (“ace” and “aro,” or “aroace”), i.e., they experience little to no sexual attraction and little to no romantic attraction. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of HB20 in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]