Search for: "Lloyd v. Miller"
Results 41 - 60
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith… [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:17 am
The Advocate General’s appeal in the case of Cherry is dismissed and Mrs Miller’s appeal is allowed. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:06 am
The UK Supreme Court has announced that judgment will be handed down in the matters of R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry & Ors v Advocate General for Scotland tomorrow morning, Tuesday 24 September 2019, at 10.30am. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:50 am
However, following judgment in the earlier Supreme Court case R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, the view taken again was that the UK Act effectively trumped the Scottish Bill, while it awaited the outcome of this constitutional challenge. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
As in Forby v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
Rulings IPSO has published three rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03356-18 Temerko v The Sunday Times, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 20876-17 Johnson v Mail Online, resolved via IPSO mediation 01053-18 Miller v The Scottish Sun, no breach after investigation 02615-18 Thurrock Council v Thurrock Independent, no breach of provision 1 (accuracy) after investigation 02821-18 Sivier v Mail Online, no… [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:48 am
ZS v DP on issue of mens rea in unlawful carnal knowledge. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am
This is an attempt to circumvent that. 1435: The Advocate General refers to point raised earlier by Lord Lloyd-Jones. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
Leteff v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case, Lucia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:59 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Inspector Jack Lee, the policeman who named Lloyd Rayney as the only suspect in his wife’s murder, has testified in his trial. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
Lloyd Rayney’s brother-in-law has testified that he still believes that Rayney killed his wife Corryn. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Manager of Shine Lawyers’ Professional Negligence practice Peter Coggins has discussed the ramifications Lloyd Rayney’s case will have on defamation law in Australia, calling it a ‘defining moment for Australian defamation law. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
On 3 March 2017 the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Lloyd-Jones and McCombe LJJ) gave judgment in the important data protection case of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Company Ltd & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 121. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm
The Court in Fourco relied heavily on its 1942 decision, Stonite Products Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Melvin Lloyd Co., 315 U.S. 561, 563 (1942). [read post]