Search for: "Local Trademarks v. Price"
Results 41 - 60
of 177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Panel 18 – Trademark Liability: Jake Linford, Justin Sevier, Allyson Willis, Sex, Drugs, and Trademark Tarnishmyths Sex/drugs inherently tarnishing? [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 4:20 am
Sabinsa Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm
What about geography, local v. globalism? [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:01 pm
International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
DC and the New Need to Eliminate Federal Patent Law Preemption of State and Local Price and Product Regulation, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 30 (Download Sarnoff.BIO.pdf) John F. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm
Is it bad for local culture because we might have had a different film instead? [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am
On a welcome turn of events, China has announced a legislative amendment being under way to crack down on "malicious" trademark registrations, which have allowed local companies to misuse well-known names and brands. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Trademarks do matter.In historical work, patent based rights are often subordinate to brand based rights. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
Bucci and Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:28 pm
Bucci and Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
Absentee member: trademark lawAudience member Jeremy Sheff commented that none of the panelists focused particularly on trademark law even though trademark, like trade secret, was a state regime for a long while before it was federalized. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
See Kam Lee Yuen Trading Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
GenOway v S.A. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:39 am
The $8 PDF price is the same price as the last few years, and I bumped down the hard copy price from $24 last year. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Lamb and The Episcopal Church v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
The District Court of Tel Aviv ruled that the trademark HABITAT, registered in Israel in multiple classes more than 40 years ago by a local furniture and house ware retailer, should be cancelled on the ground that it was registered in bad faith, since it was done with the knowledge that HABITAT was an "international mark" that enjoyed "international goodwill. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
Ltd.. v. [read post]
