Search for: "Loewe v. Loewe" Results 41 - 45 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2011, 8:23 am by Josh Wright
  If I may borrow from Thom’s description of the case: Brantley, et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:00 am by Dirk Auer
Stigler assumes the underlying goods are neither substitutes nor complements: Stigler, George J. (1963) “United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
Mr Vaid's presentation was called "Corporate Decision Making in IPR Protection and Enforcement"Mr Vaid is responsible for protecting the intellectual property rights of LVMH Fashion Group, which includes iconic brands such as LV, Marc Jacobs, LOEWE, CELINE, KENZO, Emilio Pucci and Berluti. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
The reasoning of these decisions varied at times, but the theme was consistent and widely understood that "a series of steps for conducting business could not be patented" (at pages 26-27 of his decision Justice Stevens cited several such cases including US Credit Sys Co v American Credit Indem Co (1893), Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co (1908), Loew's Drive-In Theatres, Inc v Park-In Theatres, Inc (1949)). [read post]