Search for: "Long v. California Department Of Corrections et al" Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In this case, the correct timing for litigation purposes would have been immediately following discovery of the loan. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
A rare few books that were written by a Justice but discovered long after he died are included in the total tally as in the case of Robert Jackson’s That Man: An Insider’s Portrait of Franklin D. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm by Steve Davies
’” ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, “Endangered Species Act,” 172 (Donald Baur et al., eds., 2nd ed. 2010) (citing National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Walker In the third quarter of 2011, the California Supreme Court issued two CEQA opinions and the California Appellate Courts issued 12 CEQA opinions. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am by stevemehta
Wasserman, Comden, Casselman & Pearson, L.L.P., et al., Super. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
This edition of “Petitions to Watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ “long conference,” on Monday, September 27. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:17 pm by Kent Scheidegger
That case is California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Additionally, McWane has already undertaken corrective measures to resolve the violations, at a cost of more than $7.6 million. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The Justice Department filed a complaint with the settlement agreement in U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in City of Ontario, et al., v. [read post]