Search for: "Long v. District Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 22,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2024, 7:05 pm
In Roman Catholic Diocese v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:13 am
District Court for the Northern District of California has certified a class in the consolidated cases Farangis Emami, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
District court: Sorry, only the estates of inmates who die of untreated asthma can bring that kind of claim. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
We’ll see if this ruling stands on the inevitable appeal–and how parents react to the districts’ failings in court. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm
Supreme Court in cases such as The Bremen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:05 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
The district court held that E.M.D. had failed to prove the exemption applied by “clear and convincing evidence,” and the U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
This outcome was not a surprise, since the Court granted a complete stay of the District Court's ruling in April 2023, allowing mifeprisotne to remain on the market. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
Buckley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, in the seminal case of Michigan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 12:26 pm
Bd. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
In this toxic tort action, the Colorado Supreme Court in In Re Jordan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
From Hayes v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
In May of 2023, in an unpublished District III Wisconsin Court of Appeals case also out of Marathon County entitled Henchey and Blakely v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:41 am
The district court denied all attorney’s fees but granted-in-part and denied-in-part the motions for costs. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 2:00 am
Vichy Springs Resort, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 7:24 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California appeared sympathetic to plaintiffs’ claims of genocide, but dismissed the case, saying the courts lack the ability to interfere in foreign policy decisions. [read post]