Search for: "Long v. Harding"
Results 41 - 60
of 9,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 1:20 am
We wish him a long and very happy retirement. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
(Reason)Today, in Culley v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In the long term, the extended statute of limitations is likely to significantly increase the number of enforcement cases brought by OFAC and DOJ, as well as the size of potential penalties. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
One, the government still has not come up with a “fix” for the Trust Fund problem—and even if the government acts, any “fix” will likely involve at least some reduction or long-term deferral of social security benefit payments.[5] if social security benefits drop, fiduciaries remain in the spotlight as people will likely look to them to replace what the government failed to deliver. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:25 am
In Raytheon Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
"Surely, USCIS would be hard-pressed to find that any one of the men who contributed to the founding of our great nation did not possess “extraordinary ability,” but would it draw the same conclusion about each of our Founding Fathers in the early days of their careers when their extraordinary abilities were spread across various fields? [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
According to Harper’s Bazaar, customers who want to buy a Birkin must have an extensive history of purchasing goods from the brand in order to even be offered the opportunity to purchase one of the hard-to-get bags. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
The list here is impressive and includes: People v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
The court not only wants some concrete source of authority to “speak for the state,” but the authority must be in written law or “longstanding” custom (how long? [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Stanley v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
And we’re talking here not just about lecture halls (where classroom instruction is offered) that are located right next to noisy encampments that make it hard for the students to hear and concentrate on the teacher and vice versa. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
Of course, hard questions will remain at the margins. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
There was also local opposition [13, 14] of which the Chancellor noted: “the view that is likely there is some grumbling locally about the proposals, but it is hard for that to be given much weight when the strength of feeling is insufficient to have resulted in any further letters of objection”. [read post]
