Search for: "Long v. Methodist"
Results 41 - 60
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
That decision was appealed; and in President of the Methodist Conference v Preston [2011] EWCA Civ 1581 (Ms Moore having married in the meantime), the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the EAT’s finding. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:20 pm
It is scheduled to hear arguments as an en banc court later this year in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:39 am
A Warning A bit of warning before we start: this is going to be a long post. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:14 am
”The Ohio Supreme Court in Koprivec v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:14 am
”The Ohio Supreme Court in Koprivec v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Usually the Fifth Circuit is given credit for creating the exception in 1972, in McClure v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:00 am
In Helyukh v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:48 pm
See Lehrer v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 9:48 am
Ruling on mandatory vaccination policies In Bridges v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
And a long line of Supreme Court Justices has decried the history of state Blaine Amendments as ugly, anti-Catholic bigotry. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 6:56 am
Newton and Evans v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 8:14 am
Key Precedent In re Copps Chapel Methodist Episcopal Church, 120 Ohio St. 309 (1929). [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am
Crews points to case law from Bridgeman Art Library v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
SEC (1983), and U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
The grace demonstrated by the Mother Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church is truly inspiring. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
It was thus but a step in the long campaign to discourage the Japanese from entering California and to drive out those who were already there.' (Oyama v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
In Girouard v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
The article is a vigorous argument that national injunctions are in continuity with the long-established practices of federal courts. [read post]
