Search for: "Long v. US Dept. of Justice" Results 41 - 60 of 344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
Four Justices refused to use long introductions at all (Breyer, Scalia, Souter, Thomas) and Justice Alito used them only once (Allison Engine Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Rodriguez, 109 A.D.3d 595, 599, 971 N.Y.S.2d 109 (2d Dept 2013) Justice Cooper reviewed the parties’ overall financial circumstances. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:24 am by Jan von Hein
This judgement marks the latest development in a long-running dispute involving derivative transactions used by Italian municipalities to hedge their interest rate risk. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am by MBettman
Justice Kennedy takes the opportunity to state that the court has long considered the protections of its Due Course of Law Clause to be co-extensive with the [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 1:37 pm
To continue with the cheery news, the First Dept., in an April 7, 2009 decision in a construction accident case, Kleinberg v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
This leaves us with irreconcilable directives from the Supreme Court. [read post]