Search for: "Lopez v. Bans"
Results 41 - 60
of 176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 10:55 pm
In Lopez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation (Tribal Court Exhaustion and Jurisdiction; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Lopez v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
A typical example is a 2007 Washington Supreme Court case called Scott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm
Lopez-Valenzuela 14-825Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding, contrary to this Court's decision in Demore v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Lopez (1995). [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
The two most enlightening ones are his concurrence in US v Lopez and his dissent in Gonzales v Raich. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:34 am
Even if Roe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
Lopez-Venezuela, in which he criticized the Court’s failure to grant review of cases invalidating state statutes – such as the decisions striking down five states’ bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm
Lopez and NFIB v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:31 pm
Lopez and U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
Lopez, 514 U.S. at 561. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:49 am
12/15/09 AP:Imperial County officials want to join the sponsors of California's gay marriage ban in defending Proposition 8 during an upcoming trial. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm
In the 2005 case of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:43 am
Lopez, 230 Ariz. 15, 279 P.3d 640 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2012). [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:31 am
Lopez, 230 Ariz. 15, 279 P.3d 640 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2012). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:25 pm
For example, in Lopez there was a plausible argument that a statute banning the possession of guns in a school zone was constitutional under previous precedents that the Lopez majority did not wish to overturn, because such possession has important economic effects. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
North Carolina, which asks whether a ban on social media use by sex offenders violates the First Amendment; McLane v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:24 am
Board of Assessors ROCKLAND COUNTYInsurance LawThird-Party Defendant Obligated to Defend County In Underlying Suit; County Granted Costs of Defense Lopez v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:08 am
Adolfo Martinez-Lopez SUFFOLLK COUNTYCriminal PracticePreclusion Denied; Defendant's Ability To Engage in Motion Practice Not Impaired by Minor Errors People v. [read post]
