Search for: "Lowe v. Price et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
The case, Colgate, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
The anitrust case (Pacific Bell Telephone, et al., v. linkLine Communications, et al., 07-512) is a test of the theory that a “prize squeeze” violates the Sherman Act. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Low Quality Brief: Morales v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
Shelton, et al. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:55 am
In an unpublished decision entitled Avalon Princeton, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:21 am
So where the buyer complains that the server logs are gone, the buyer maybe wanted to get possession of those and review them before closing. 5) I must confess that the $2.5M purchase price for DYAC seemed a little low. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:37 am
Versata Enterprises, Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:26 am
The Ninth Circuit’s Recent Brantley Decision Brantley, et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:05 am
Roberts, Jr., wrote for the Court in Pacific Bell, et al., v. linkLine Communications (07-512). [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:03 pm
The appeal in Defenders of Wildlife, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
McSorley's Old Ale HouseMarilyn A. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm
As the abstract says, “The plaintiffs bringing these cases target hundreds or thousands of defendants nationwide and seek quick settlements priced just low enough that it is less expensive for the defendant to pay rather than to defend the claim, regardless of the claim’s merits. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
SchefferAmicus brief of Professors of Legal History et al. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:20 pm
 One example shows the case of Fagan v Amerisourcebergen Corp. et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am
In a shifting climate—literally and metaphorically—insurers may see an opportunity—or a necessity—to adjust their pricing models. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:27 pm
When Caitlin Halligan came to the podium to argue on behalf of respondents Eurodif et al., the Justices focused on what the Chief Justice described as the "substance versus formality question. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:40 am
The Research Foundation of State University of New York, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Hovenkamp et al. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
The Broughtons also argue that, depending on the degree of price inadequacy, there may be a presumption that an irregularity in the sale caused the low price. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
., Chang et al., 2019; Fang et al., 2016; He and Tian, 2016; Grullon et al., 2015; Massa et al., 2015). [read post]
