Search for: "Lucas v. District Court" Results 41 - 60 of 307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Other district courts have allowed too many documents to be sealed in previous high stakes cases like Broadcom v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am by Sarah Libowsky, Krista Oehlke
According to immigration law professor Lucas Guttentag’s Immigration Policy Tracking Project, the Trump administration made more than 1,000 policy changes to the immigration system. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Ilya Somin
The District Court, in turn, concluded that there was an adequate factual basis for this verdict. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:20 am by Tia Sewell
District Court for the District of Columbia, seeks more than $1.3 billion in damages. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The District Court, in turn, concluded that there was an adequate factual basis for this verdict. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
New York City and Lucas v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
After the district court sent the case back to state court, the companies appealed to the U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 3:17 pm by Josh Blackman
The District Court found that the policy "was a neutral law of general application, as defined by the Supreme Court's precedents. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit overturned the district court’s ruling holding instead that the state court requirement was overturned in the Knick v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Toledo- Lucas County Health Department, (ND OH, Dec. 14, 2020), an Ohio federal district court refused to issue a temporary restraining order against COVID-19 rules which bar in-person instruction at the high school level, and bar use of schools for various activities. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit held that the district court erred in denying the State’s renewed JMOL because plaintiff’s evidence did not establish a taking under Lucas or Penn Central. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:28 am by Derek T. Muller
(Professor Michael Morley has some thoughts about how lower courts have construed the scope of Bush v. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit held that the district court erred in denying the State’s renewed JMOL because plaintiff’s evidence did not establish a taking under Lucas or Penn Central. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The district court entered summary judgment for the defendants, but we remanded his case for trial. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit held that the district court erred in denying the State’s renewed JMOL because plaintiff’s evidence did not establish a taking under Lucas or Penn Central. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit held that the district court erred in denying the State’s renewed JMOL because plaintiff’s evidence did not establish a taking under Lucas or Penn Central. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit held that the district court erred in denying the State’s renewed JMOL because plaintiff’s evidence did not establish a taking under Lucas or Penn Central. [read post]