Search for: "Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2008, 11:24 am
Such claims for compensation are fostered by the 1992 decision, Lucas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:28 am by Scott Bomboy
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), to support their claim that they should be able to sell the property or seek compensation from the government. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:29 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, Justice Scalia established the relevant background principles of state property law as the reference point for testing whether public regulation or private property goes so far as to constitute a categorical taking of property. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:42 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1027 (Lucas) that if a regulation has the effect of depriving an owner of all economically beneficial use of their property, a permanent taking has occurred. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
South Carolina Coastal Council, an opinion that quickly eroded because of its fundamental incoherence (i.e. what is an “inherent limitation on title”? [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 8:05 am by Eric Claeys
South Carolina Coastal Council) after a state natural resources agency limited new development in the area. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:46 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
South Carolina Coastal Council offers a “rare” exception to this framework, holding that if a regulation destroys “all economically viable use” of a piece of property, then it is a taking per se. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am by Glen C. Hansen
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992)), and they failed to establish that they suffered a taking under the more general test of Penn Central Trans. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am by Glen C. Hansen
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992)), and they failed to establish that they suffered a taking under the more general test of Penn Central Trans. [read post]