Search for: "M/V Denise" Results 41 - 60 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
TUESDAY Paper Session: Comparative History of Legal Cultures (Private Law)Tue, 6/20: 10:00 AM  - 11:45 AM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Sala 455, Danubio Tower (4th Floor) ·         Chair—Andrés Botero Bernal, Industrial University of Santander ·         Discussant—Dong Jiang, Renmin University of China  ·         A Comparison of… [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
This was the judicial review of Denise Brewster(Northern Ireland) on appeal. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees,  you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
I’m way behind in blogging clickthrough agreement cases, but I’m prioritizing this opinion because of its simplicity. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 8:50 pm by Douglas
Atualmente, diversos serviços e facilidades são colocados à disposição dos consumidores pelas empresas de telecomunicações: jogos, vídeos, voz, música, mensagens de texto – quase tudo pode estar acoplado a um telefone celular. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:01 pm by Douglas
De modo similar, no Recurso Especial 926.331, a ministra Denise Arruda, já falecida, manteve acórdão do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região (TRF3) que entendeu que o exercício do “natural jus sperniandi” não configura atentado à dignidade da Justiça. [read post]