Search for: "M & B Distributing Co., Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2021, 4:23 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve probably heard that a little over two months ago, New York State Governor Andrew M. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am by Peter Mahler
I’m guessing he was left out of the federal action because his inclusion would have destroyed diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
[I'm continuing to serialize a forthcoming article of mine that discusses (among other things) such a proposed interpretation of libel law.] [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am by Brian E. Barreira
§ 541(b)(1)) provides that ‘Property of the estate does not include any power that the debtor may only exercise solely for the benefit of an entity other than the debtor. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But such speakers can usually be fairly confident that their target won't invest the money in getting and enforcing a judgment.[1] [B.] 47 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[2]  In 2019, Insurance Insider reported that TransRe’s “[m]ispricing on these liability lines has generated a $3bn to $5bn hole in reserves, stemming significantly from D&O. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:08 am by Shannon O'Hare
Ireland is a member state of the EU and also of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Ninth Inning, Inc., 19-1098Issues: (1) Whether an agreement among the members of a joint venture on how best to distribute the venture’s jointly created core product may be condemned under the Sherman Act without requiring the plaintiff to establish that defendants harmed competition in a properly defined antitrust market; and (2) whether, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:21 am by Eric Caligiuri
Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant Western Stone and Metal Corp., doing business as Shane Co., distributed and/or sold four engagement rings (“Subject Products”) that are substantially similar to Plaintiff’s copyrighted jewelry designs. [read post]