Search for: "M B v. J D" Results 41 - 60 of 2,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Pix Credit here Lo que fue en su tiempo una revolución de jóvenes valientes, audaces, creativos, se convertía con el paso del tiempo, de su institucionalización y aferramiento a los mecanismos del poder, en algo esencialemente conservador hasta transformarse en una gerontorcracia renuente a cualquier renovación efectiva. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
 le juge Beaupré: Même lorsque les 3 conditions d’application de la préclusion découlant d’une question déjà tranchée sont remplies, le juge conserve le pouvoir discrétionnaire de refuser d’en faire bénéficier le défendeur. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]