Search for: "MARKS V HHS"
Results 41 - 60
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The 28 January 2020 marked the 14th edition of “Data Protection Day”, the anniversary of the opening for signature of Convention 108, the global data protection Convention. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The Guardian has an article by leading commentator Richard Ackland, “Mark Speakman SC: meet the man leading the charge to update Australia’s lopsided defamation laws”. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 11:51 pm
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (HH Judge Hacon) Fromageries Bel SA v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (Ch) (12 Dec 2019) This was an appeal against Mr Allan James's decision of 13 Feb 2019 that the registration of the above 3-dimensional sign under trade mark number UK2060882 was invalid. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:33 am
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (HH Judge Hacon) Bentley 1962 Ltd and another v Bentley Motors Ltd [2019] EWHC 2925 (Ch) (1 Nov 2019) This was a claim for trade mark infringement against the well-known luxury car manufacturer, Bentley Motors Ltd. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm
In the controversial 2014 case Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:12 pm
The Trump administration has pointed to that agreement—called the “Flores settlement” after Flores v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
V. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
Max Hill v Mail on Sunday, A Man v The Gazette (Paisley) Ward v Mail on Sunday. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:43 pm
Reprinted from The Government Contractor, with permission of Thomson Reuters. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Circuit ruled against the Obama Administration in Central United Life Insurance v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
See HH Judge Parkes QC in Donovan v Gibbons [2014] EWHC 3406 (QB) at [6] and Warby J in Ames v Spamhaus Project Ltd [2015] EWHC 127 (QB) at [55]: “….there may be circumstances in which one would naturally expect to see tangible evidence that a statement had caused harm to reputation, but as practitioners in this field are well aware, it is generally impractical for a claimant to seek out witnesses to say that they read the words complained of and thought the… [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
Reuters reports that this decision marks the semi-autonomous province’s “first military foray into Syria’s war. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:46 pm
We don’t normally follow Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) decisions, but Public Citizen v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am
Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.Halbig v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
Maciel, Mark M. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
It is a restoration of the high-water mark of free exercise accommodation, established by the cases of Sherbert v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
" That is why a unanimous Supreme Court was able to declare, in the 1982 case of U.S. v. [read post]
