Search for: "MARKS v. STEIN"
Results 41 - 60
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:17 am
The three-year statute of limitations began to run on March 16, 2017, when a consent to change attorney form was executed by plaintiff, defendant Wallace Law Office, and defendant Leav & Steinberg, LLP (L&S), the incoming counsel (CPLR 214[6]; Frost Line Refrig., Inc. v Gaswirth, Mirsky & Stein, LLP, 25 AD3d 532, 532-533 [2d Dept 2006]). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am
A defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing a legal malpractice cause of action has the burden of establishing prima facie that he or she did not fail to exercise such skill and knowledge, or that the claimed departure did not proximately cause the plaintiff to sustain damages” (Bakcheva v Law Offs. of Stein & Assoc., 169 AD3d 624, 625 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:29 am
” Ehrlich v Stein, another Second Department decision from 1988 in which the court reversed the lower court’s order denying a motion to compel arbitration and directed the parties to arbitration of the 50% shareholders’ dissolution claim based on deadlock. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 11:08 am
Yes, said Judge Sidney Stein last year in Doe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:26 am
. cause of action” (Lawrence v Graubard Miller, 11 NY3d 588, 595 [2008] [emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted]; see Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d at 1182). [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am
Fine Art Ltd. v Lacher, 115 AD3d 600, 601 [2014]), and requires a showing of “egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior on the part of the defendant attorneys” (Savitt v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 AD3d 506, 507 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; Wailes v Tel Networks USA, LLC, 116 AD3d 625, 625-626 [2014]). [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Corbett, [*2]P.C., 175 AD3d 473, 473-474 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d 1504, 1505; Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 697). [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm
Stein v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:11 pm
Her amicus brief in Matal v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
Stein, by Special Deputy Attorney General Richard H. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
Stein, by Assistant Attorney General Alexander G. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:18 am
Stein, by Assistant Attorney General Joseph L. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
Attorney General Josh Stein, by Special Deputy Attorney General Keith Clayton, for the State-Appellee. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
Stein, by Special Deputy Attorney General M.A. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:03 am
v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am
Here, the plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action accrued on March 20, 2012, when she, acting on the defendants’ advice, filed the bankruptcy petition (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Tantleff v Kestenbaum & Mark, 131 AD3d 955, 956; Landow v Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., 111 AD3d 795, 796). [read post]
Recent Decision Highlights Importance of Pleading Compliance with the Federal Patent Marking Statute
26 Apr 2019, 6:16 am
See Express Mobile, Inc. v. [read post]
