Search for: "MARRIAGE OF LAWRENCE" Results 41 - 60 of 893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm by Laurence Tribe
  And, to make matters worse, the Court would have to perform legal acrobatics far more painful to behold than those employed in Naim, because Lawrence laid the groundwork for striking down bans on same-sex marriage in much starker terms than did Brown for invalidation of anti-miscegenation laws – terms so stark that Justice Scalia, in his ferocious Lawrence dissent, as much as conceded that a rejection of the federal constitutional right to same-sex… [read post]
14 May 2011, 2:37 pm by Alfred Brophy
Same-sex marriage: situating a modern controversy in historical context Joanna L. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:53 am by Brandon Bartels
His opinion in Lawrence paves the way for such a position (as Justice Scalia emphasized in his dissent), and I think he and the Court majority will apply the logic in the Loving v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:30 am by LindaMBeale
    Not recognizing the gay marriage of two individuals X and Y has absolutely nothing to do with the validity and worth of the non-gay marriage of another two individuals A and B. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:21 am by Ruth Carter
Just under 30 years later, I was at San Francisco Pride right after the Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm by Erwin Chemerinsky
William Duncan writes of allowing marriage equality as “los[ing] . . . marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
" Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that "Supreme Court's landmark ruling legalizes gay marriage nationwide. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
09/29/09 The Tennessee Divorce and Custody Blog:Considering the divorce case in Indiana, attorney Lawrence A. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
What if a state really were to get out of the marriage business by abolishing the legal status of marriage? [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Gay and Lesbian Advocates & Defenders has filed a challenge to the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), a provision of federal law that requires the federal government to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages, or to treat the partners in same-sex marriages as spouses, for any purpose of federal law. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:09 am
He pointed out that the definition of marriage had prevailed for millennia and it seemed a fast change; on the other hand, he noted that the time between Lawrence and this case was about equal to the time between Brown and Loving -- this raised the question for him of whether this might all be too fast to redefine such a long standing institution. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:06 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Smith successfully challenged the constitutionality of sodomy laws in the landmark Supreme Court opinion, Lawrence v. [read post]