Search for: "MARSHALL v. MONTGOMERY" Results 41 - 60 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1824, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in Gibbons v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:55 am
Field Marshall Montgomery pinned the British Distiguished Service Order on Cota. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
She was too politic to say this directly, but her tribute to her colleague Thurgood Marshall (Thurgood Marshall: The Influence of a Raconteur, 44 Stan. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:21 am by Jeff Gamso
Wagner, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County (Dayton), Ohio. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Black, A Constitutional Faith (1968) Certain other works dealt with obscure matters or issues of foreign law, such as the following: John Marshall Harlan, Manning the Dikes; Some Comments on the Statutory Certiorari Jurisdiction and Jurisdictional Statement Practice of the Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Ruth Bader Ginsburg, A Selective Survey of English Language Studies on Scandinavian Law (1970) Stephen G. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
He was the third Director-Counsel of LDF, following Thurgood Marshall and Jack Greenberg. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm by James Romoser
He was represented by Thurgood Marshall, seven years before Marshall became a justice himself. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
Petitioner Heriberto Menendez – an Ohio medical doctor who retired to Florida – was sued by respondent Marshall Garber for malpractice. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:32 am by Joseph D. Kearney
This standing rule of the public dedication doctrine was far from perfect (we shift to the past tense because the Illinois Supreme Court repudiated the common-law version of the doctrine in 1970, in Paepcke v. [read post]