Search for: "MARTIN REDISH"
Results 41 - 60
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 2:23 pm
Redish has this essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 7:16 am
David Bernstein writes: [Northwestern Law Prof Martin] Redish concludes, and this Reviewer agrees, it was entirely appropriate — under the First Amendment, and also morally — for businesses and individuals... [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
We've posted before about the problems that arise when a government hires private lawyers on a contingent fee basis to represent it.Point of Law now alerts us to a new paper by Professor Martin Redish that argues that these arrangements are, at the very least, politically improper, and probably unconstitutional to boot. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:06 am
A June 1 House hearing on class actions included testimony from Professor Martin Redish and John Beisner. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:15 am
I've just posted a book review of Martin Redish's book Wholesale Justice: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Class Action Lawsuit (Stanford U. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:39 am
Martin Redish, Northwestern University Law School, is publishing Fear, Loathing, and the First Amendment: Optimistic Skepticism and the Theory of Free Expression in the Ohio State Law Journal (forthcoming). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
Martin Redish and I discuss "Is the First Amendment Being Misused as a Deregulatory Tool? [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:08 pm
From a December Searle Center conference: the Northwestern law professor gives a presentation on his recent paper, "Cy Pres Relief and the Pathologies of the Modern Class Action: A Normative and Empirical Analysis. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
Sullivan: An Essay in Honor of Martin Redish (Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 107, Issue 2, 2013) on SSRN. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 3:19 am
Bernstein summarises:This is a review essay of Martin Redish, "The Logic of Persecution. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 2:08 am
Northwestern Law professor Martin Redish should be very familiar to readers of this blog. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 7:29 pm
Here is a very interesting empirical paper examining post-Twombly pleading from Martin Redish and Lee Epstein describing the state of affairs at the appellate court level, they write: To briefly summarize the state of the appellate doctrine on the issue: (1) two circuits (the D.C. and Federal Circuits) have concluded that Twombly has changed the pleading standard not at all.88 (2) Three circuits (the Third, Seventh and Tenth Circuits) view Twombly as establishing a sliding scale… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:10 pm
Republished by Blog Post PromoterDavid Bernstein writes: [Northwestern Law Prof Martin] Redish concludes, and this Reviewer agrees, it was entirely appropriate — under the First Amendment, and also morally — for businesses and individuals to boycott members of the Stalinist CPUSA. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:08 pm
Republished by Old Post PromoterDavid Bernstein writes: [Northwestern Law Prof Martin] Redish concludes, and this Reviewer agrees, it was entirely appropriate — under the First Amendment, and also morally — for businesses and individuals to boycott members of the Stalinist CPUSA. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 6:31 pm
Here, by way of weekend reading, is an abstract for a paper I gave in response to Martin Redish at a symposium on speech and silence in American law. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:47 pm
Redish says, so what? [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
Martin H. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 9:46 pm
Will be eagerly awaiting this new book (hat tip Burch/Mass Tort Prof) from the prominent Constitutional and federal-courts scholar. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:39 am
This year, we are excited to have Richard Freer, Jim Pfander, Martin Redish, and Louise Weinberg as commentators on papers submitted by junior faculty members from across the country.Please e-mail me at jcsharpe@illinois.edu, or visit the workshop website at http://www.law.uiuc.edu/faculty-admin/federal-court-workshop.asp if you would like to attend, or if you have questions. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 7:45 am
In the first, Professor Martin Redish argues that the president cannot pardon former Sheriff Joe Arpaio. [read post]
