Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 41 - 60
of 20,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2024, 4:01 am
On appeal, the appropriate mechanism for considering the complainant’s testimony is the curative proviso in s. 686(1)(b)(iii). [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 1:49 am
Interpretation of the EPC B. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 5:04 pm
If you have been injured due to the negligence of a governmental entity, don’t wait. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 5:04 pm
If you have been injured due to the negligence of a governmental entity, don’t wait. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 5:04 pm
If you have been injured due to the negligence of a governmental entity, don’t wait. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 4:13 pm
" The government engages in "the greatest First Amendment sin"—viewpoint discrimination—when it targets not just a subject matter, but "particular views taken by speakers" on that subject matter. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 6:33 am
” This wasn’t suitable for resolution on a motion to dismiss. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
Oregon courts have developed an unusual framework for dealing with that provision, and I won't dwell on it here. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
This wasn’t organized by any group. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:00 am
” Two minutes later, Tarrio insisted: “Don’t fucking leave. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 1:19 am
Two examples of why this policy is needed and the context to it The first is a case which took place in Carlisle and was reported on here https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2023-10-21/family-court-files-mothers-ordeal-after-judge-dismisses-rape-allegation-in-error/ (judgments here https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2023/180 and here https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewfc/b/2024/12 ) The court ordered no contact, revoked PR, and permitted a change… [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 3:29 pm
We also note, as an initial matter, that the Rule doesn’t require consumers to actually avail themselves of a negative option in order to trigger the Rule’s applicability; only that the good or service in question be marketed or sold “with” a negative option feature. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 9:37 am
., B-422615 (Aug. 30, 2024), the protester, Radiance Technologies, Inc. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 8:43 am
That’s certainly a matter of legitimate health-policy concern, whether or not it’s a competition matter, and whether or not it is caused by the PBM practices at-issue. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 6:24 am
After all, those two States (unlike, say, Germany) aren’t even parties to the Rome Statute that created the ICC. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 4:32 am
" There is no settled view on the matter. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 3:24 pm
For example, the producers of the Star Wars franchise have aggressively defended their trademarks against unauthorized uses, ensuring that the franchise’s branding remains intact and exclusive.[6] However, filmmakers must also be mindful of potential pitfalls, such as trademark dilution, which occurs when a mark’s distinctiveness is weakened, or unintentional infringement by fan-made content.[7] To avoid such issues, filmmakers should register their trademarks early and monitor fan… [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 11:15 am
" That matter is pending, though a month ago FCC Commissioner Nathan Simington urged the FCC to close it. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 7:53 am
Conclusion and Implications This case is interesting mainly because of its players and subject matter, and the obvious specter of legislative hypocrisy pervading it. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
," and (b) "Is installing an in-ground trampoline 'landscaping'? [read post]
