Search for: "MATTER OF D R B" Results 41 - 60 of 5,959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm by Patent Docs
., sued Aliphcom (d/b/a Jawbone) for infringement of U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granting a motion for judgment as a matter of law filed by Appellee Genetic Veterinary Sciences, Inc., d/b/a Paw Prints Genetics ("PPG"), and as a result, found that the asserted claims of U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 7:18 pm
Supreme Court denied Zurich's and granted B&R's cross motion for summary judgment. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
If you just want a short take-away, here is a translation of the headnotes:“Relevant” in R 104(b) means “suitable for leading to a different outcome of the appeal proceedings”.An objection under R 106 has to be raised expressis verbis; a request for remittal, for postponement or for continuation in writing does not qualify as such an objection. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am by Raymond Wee Hock Tan
We are after all, all migrants to Australia. yìdàlì rén,xīlà rén ,yàzhōu rén yǐqián dōushì bèi qíshì de 。Xiànzài cónɡ zhōnɡdōnɡ,āfùhàn lái de nànmín yě yíyànɡ bei… [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:00 am by Pietro Franzina
B (C-184/14), clarifying the interpretation of Regulation No 4/2009 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations (the Maintenance Regulation). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The proprietor then requested the following written statement to be included in the minutes of the OPs: “Respondent is of the opinion that the fact that D24 is admitted so late (1 month prior to OPs) in the proceedings followed by the subsequent denial of the admissibility of late filed claims is in violation of the right to be heard (R 113) [sic] and R 112 [sic]. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:55 pm by Matthew Kahn
(b)  Heads of AI R&D agencies shall budget an amount for AI R&D that is appropriate for this prioritization. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am by J
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by Dennis Crouch
The Patent Reform Act of 2011 (S. 23) was introduced on January 25, 2011 by Senator Leahy (D-VT) who was joined by eight co-sponsors (all from the Judiciary Committee) that include Senators Coons (D-DE), Franken (D-MN), Grassley (R-IA), Hatch (R-UT), Klobuchar (D-MN), Kyl (R-AZ), Lieberman (I-CT), and Sessions (R-AL). [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
" Then they pull their d***s out. 'I bet if one of these women stands up and talks about it, people are going to say, 'So what? [read post]