Search for: "MATTER OF D T H" Results 41 - 60 of 2,383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am by MBettman
If the statute has certain factors in it, and it doesn’t have other factors in it, and the court considers extraneous matters, isn’t that subject to appellate review? [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:44 am
D&H Company, Dodge Brothers, Inc., and Giant Oil Company of Arkansas, Inc., pays $190,000 to settle an Americans With Disabilities Act ("ADA")lawsuit. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 1:04 pm
Notice also that 216.7(d)(3) is somewhat broader in its scope than 216.6(h) in that the advisory paragraph required by 216.7(d)(3) must be included in both coverage rejection and explanation letters.11 NYCRR § 216.6(h)'s RequirementWhich brings us to letters "rejecting any element of a claim involving personal property insurance", the first type of letter in which the advisory paragraph must be included. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 1:24 pm
 Notice also that 216.7(d)(3) is somewhat broader in its scope than 216.6(h) in that the advisory paragraph required by 216.7(d)(3) must be included in both coverage rejection and explanation letters.11 NYCRR § 216.6(h)'s Requirement Which brings us to "[a]ny notice [broader than "letter"?] [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The patent proprietor requested that:- the decision of the opposition division to maintain European patent EP 1369037 Bl in amended form based on auxiliary request D be set aside and that the patent be maintained as granted- alternatively, that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of any of claim sets A-J or A'-I' in the following order: A, A', B, B', C, C', D, D', E, E', F, F',G, G', H,… [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:03 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Empty Pockets (Photo credit: danielmoyle) H is for Hardship Withdrawal. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:02 am by SHG
So you’d think actually climbing up and sitting on a statue wouldn’t even cross your mind. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It therefore provides the means to stop applicants, in reply to the first communication, dropping existing claims, replacing them by switching to unsearched and non-unitary subject-matter extracted from the description, i.e., claiming different subject-matter in sequence rather than simultaneously (T 274/03 [4], T 915/03 [3], T 1285/11 [2]). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing the decision in Matter of Marsteller, 217 AD3d 543, the Appellate Division said "(t)he affirmation of Eric J. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing the decision in Matter of Marsteller, 217 AD3d 543, the Appellate Division said "(t)he affirmation of Eric J. [read post]