Search for: "MATTER OF J B"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2017, 10:51 am
By William J. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:50 am
Nicholas J. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 2:51 pm
B. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 8:11 am
Paul Wickham Schmidt, former Chair of the BIA , filed this dissent to Matter of J-G-R- , 23 I &N Dec. 733 (BIA 2023). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:21 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0505, 2009 MT 428N, IN RE THE PARENTING OF: J.D.B. and J.R.B., Minor children, J.M.B., Pettitioner and Appellant, and E.B., Respondent, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:49 am
Eve, J.). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:07 am
P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but dismissed the false patent marking case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to sufficiently plead intent to deceive. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am
How can you reach the "substantial" threshold on a gateway (b) defence/counterclaim when you haven't had sight of the claimant's papers which may (or may not) enable your gateway (b) defence/counterclaim to be made out? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am
How can you reach the "substantial" threshold on a gateway (b) defence/counterclaim when you haven't had sight of the claimant's papers which may (or may not) enable your gateway (b) defence/counterclaim to be made out? [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:00 pm
As for those landlords who allegedly violate J-51, “CPLR 901 (b) permits… plaintiffs to utilize the class action mechanism to recover compensatory overcharges. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
”[2] The subject matter of decision G 1/09 was a divisional application filed after a decision refusing the parent application had been rendered, but before the appeal period had expired. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 12:39 pm
October 18, 2007)(Schneider, J.) dismissed the debtor's chapter 7 case as an "abuse" under section 707(b)(1) based on the "totality of the circumstances" test of section 707(b)(3). [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0163, 2009 MT 313N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, the [applicant] was entitled to file on its motion matter that it considered to be missing.[7] The references to “missing” drawings appearing in each of paragraphs (1) to (3) of R 56 must be interpreted consistently with each other to give a meaningful effect to the rule as a whole (see also J 27/10 [10]). [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
CHAMBERS LEONARD B. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
CHAMBERS LEONARD B. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
CHAMBERS LEONARD B. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
CHAMBERS LEONARD B. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
Robert J. [read post]
