Search for: "MATTER OF J J C J"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
In re Hayden C. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, apart from R 30 itself, the Decision of the President of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 concerning the filing of sequence listings (OJ EPO 2007, special edition No. 3, C.1, p. 26) is of relevance. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 8:56 pm
Birkholz, Brian C. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, the [applicant] was entitled to file on its motion matter that it considered to be missing.[7] The references to “missing” drawings appearing in each of paragraphs (1) to (3) of R 56 must be interpreted consistently with each other to give a meaningful effect to the rule as a whole (see also J 27/10 [10]). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
As the Board had already explained in its decisions J 7/96 [2.2] and J 8/96 [2.2], these provisions form part of a system of legal process which is provided under the EPC for determining the right to a European patent application when this is in dispute, and for implementing this determination. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
§ 157(b)(2)(C)) are defined as "core"? [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
MCALPIN, PETE C. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:43 pm
The lectures of Mario J. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Professional representatives are subject to the disciplinary power exercised by the Institute of Professional Representatives (epi) or the EPO (A 134a(1)(c)) whereas the disciplinary power to which legal practitioners are subject is a matter of national law and is exercised by national organisations or offices. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
J 37/89 [3.5]). [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
How did the Legal Board decide this matter? [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
In later decisions J 24/96 [2] and T 1382/08 [1.1], however, the question is discussed in detail and answered by stating that the allocation pursuant to A 21(3)(c) unambiguously provides that the LBA is competent. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 6:04 am
" Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas Judge Idee C. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am
In other words, the reimbursement of a fee requires there to be special provision (see for example decision J 33/86). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:43 pm
Although Birss J did not refer to recent decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the right of communication/making available to the public, he appeared to dismiss implicitly the approach taken in Svensson [Katposts here] and its progeny, ie BestWater [here] and C More Entertainment [here and here]. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:13 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 12-0047 and DA 12-0048, 2012 MT 137, IN THE MATTER OF: C.J.M. and A.J.M., Youths in Need of Care. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
(c) A patent application involves two different aspects. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 5:10 am
The last case on the oral argument calendar today in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals is an interesting bar discipline matter No. 19-BG-0674 IN RE EVAN J. [read post]
