Search for: "MATTER OF J R T"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
So now if you can’t get a job, it doesn’t matter, because you still get to eat. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the written decision, the ED considered that the subject-matter of this request contravened R 164(2) and R 137(5). [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
In later decisions J 24/96 [2] and T 1382/08 [1.1], however, the question is discussed in detail and answered by stating that the allocation pursuant to A 21(3)(c) unambiguously provides that the LBA is competent. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:45 am
It doesn’t matter whether you get married or divorced during the year: the day that matters is the last day of the year. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 4:19 pm
Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), who is investigating the matter," Washington University medical-school Dean Larry J. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
The opponent also cited inter alia decisions T 932/93 and T 358/08, which confirmed that a request according to R 99(1)(c) could be implicit, the extent of the appeal being a matter for the grounds of appeal, and J 25/92, wherein it was considered that if a request was uncertain, the EPO should clarify the situation by asking the requester. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:02 pm
District Judge Joseph R. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:01 pm
T 19/87 [5]; T 668/89 [3]; T 417/00 [2.3] T 1829/10 [2.4]). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
The OD referred to the date set under R 71a EPC 1973 and to the fact that the letter dated 16 January 2008 was not in their file. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:39 am
June 9, 2011 Nealon, J.), Judge Terrence R. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Most of the case law cited by the appellant (T 128/87, T 14/89, J 13/90) is also discussed in G 2/97. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 5:29 am
It's just some failure to report perks as income, isn't it? [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:23 pm
Smith, Anthony Montesano, Edward T. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
As can be seen from the basic proposition for a revision of the EPC of October 13, 2000 (MR/2/00, Number 6, A 122), the lawmaker wanted to keep the possibility of re-establishment into the time limit for further processing, which had been acknowledged by the case law (J 12/92 [3.2.2]; J 29/94 [3], J 902/87 [2.2-4]). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
J 37/89 [3.5]). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 7:02 am
R. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am
Shortly after T 1402/13, R.51(2) was amended (per 1/1/2017) for clarification by addition of a last sentence "The legal consequence laid down in Article 86, paragraph 1, shall ensue upon expiry of the six-month period. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
How did the Legal Board decide this matter? [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 3:46 am
— Donald J. [read post]
