Search for: "MATTER OF J W J C"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,055
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Richman, Jennifer J. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Richman, Jennifer J. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:05 am
In all custody matters, our primary concern is, and must continue to be, the well-being of the most fragile human participant—that of the minor child. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
Context matters. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
J. (2023).) [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Jackson endeared himself to FDR by aggressively prosecuting—some would say abusively—Andrew W. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
As John W. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
The books are Patrick J. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Campuzano Díaz, Beatriz “The participation of the European… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
C 94-4054 CW [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Plaintiff must plead enough details about the subject matter of her case to present a story that holds together and that supports her accusations with a basis in plausible, articulable facts. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
., 440 U.S. 202, 203 (1979) (“[C]ompensation to cover a landowner’s litigation costs is a matter of legislative grace rather than constitutional command. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
C. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
And in W. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
[Here's a draft of my article, on the constitutionality of anti-BDS laws and other related matters, forthcoming in a symposium at The University of the Pacific Law Review.] [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
But the trial court here took judicial notice of the truth of disputed factual matters. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
The Florida Act bars professors from "espous[ing], promot[ing], or advanc[ing]," Fla. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
But the parishes in the matter counter-argued that the challenge was only mooted to the extent of the 200-transaction threshold but not the $100,000 threshold, and also that the new law would not take effect until August 1, 2023, ostensibly in a bid to persuade the court not to dismiss the matter and to issue a decision that Louisiana’s decentralized system is constitutional. [read post]
