Search for: "MATTER OF J W K" Results 41 - 60 of 421
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 11:12 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The 18-count indictment, returned on June 12 and unsealed today, named the following individuals: Kashma Jordan a/k/a Gold, 32, of 3349 Lodwick Drive, Warren, Ohio, 44485; Robert Harvey a/k/a Bob, 38, of 2692 Brier Street SE, Warren, Ohio, 44484; Juan Worthey, Jr. a/k/a Bones, 37, of 163 Church Street, Washington, Pennsylvania, 15301; Mario Rodgers a/k/a Rio, 39, of 527 Washington Street NE, Warren, Ohio, 44483; Brandon Wise a/k/a B-Wise, 28, of 133 Maple… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:12 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The 18-count indictment, returned on June 12 and unsealed today, named the following individuals: Kashma Jordan a/k/a Gold, 32, of 3349 Lodwick Drive, Warren, Ohio, 44485; Robert Harvey a/k/a Bob, 38, of 2692 Brier Street SE, Warren, Ohio, 44484; Juan Worthey, Jr. a/k/a Bones, 37, of 163 Church Street, Washington, Pennsylvania, 15301; Mario Rodgers a/k/a Rio, 39, of 527 Washington Street NE, Warren, Ohio, 44483; Brandon Wise a/k/a B-Wise, 28, of 133 Maple… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am by Robert A. Epstein
  For instance, if the payor spouse is required by his employer to contribute $30,000 per year towards his 401(k), should such money be included in that spouse's income in determining support? [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Greely, The Death of Roe and the Future of Ex Vivo Embryos, (J. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:05 am by Eugene Volokh
In all custody matters, our primary concern is, and must continue to be, the well-being of the most fragile human participant—that of the minor child. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 29 April 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of The Advocate General representing the Commissioners of HMRC v K E Entertainments Ltd (Scotland) .This appeal will consider whether the taxpayer (K E Entertainment Ltd)’s claim to a repayment of VAT fell within the scope of the Principal VAT Directive, Articles 73 and 90, together with (if necessary) VAT Regulation 38 (as the taxpayer contends) or within VAT Act section 80 and is therefore time-barred (as… [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 11:06 pm
Comput. 25, 191-206 (2009).The copied, source article is Lee, W., Lee, H-J. [read post]