Search for: "MATTER OF K M G"
Results 41 - 60
of 529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
M. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The board also comes to the conclusion that the subject-matter of claim 1 cannot claim priority from the US application No. 835,799, but by a line of reasoning which differs from that of the OD. [7] A 87(1), inter alia, stipulates that the right to priority for the purpose of filing a European patent application can only be enjoyed insofar as the earlier application and the later European application disclose the “same invention”. [8] In its decision G 2/93 [5] and… [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:05 pm
Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1980.Coward, Harold G. and K. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 6:49 pm
" (Source: Cease and Desist order issued "In the matter of Carl M. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:01 pm
For example, instead of taking the value of 100 Å as proposed by the Board the skilled person could equally have taken a value of 1 μm, leading to a sheet resistance of 105 Ohms/square for a conductivity of 0.1 S/cm, or 10 μm, leading to a sheet resistance of 104 Ohms/square, outside of the claimed range. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am
g. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:52 pm
M. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:06 am
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)Joshua M. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
As most readers of this blog will be aware of, G 1/93 made the following statement:A feature which has not been disclosed in the application as filed but which has been added to the application during examination and which, without providing a technical contribution to the subject-matter of the claimed invention, merely limits the protection conferred by the patent as granted by excluding protection for part of the subject-matter of the claimed invention as covered by the… [read post]
17 May 2023, 10:31 am
IP subject matter can qualify as cultural heritage in certain circumstances, and cultural heritage subject matter may use IP as a vehicle to serve its aims. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
It is however noted that the examination as to whether or not the amendments comply with the requirements of A 84 (see G 9/91 [19]) that the claims shall be clear and, both individually and in their entirety, be concise, is a different matter. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
Jeffrey G. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:29 pm
The Court in Gürbüz and Bayar v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The [patent proprietors] argue that the invention only concerns as cast structures […], and hence the claimed subject-matter must also relate to such steel strip, whether or not it is explicitly defined. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
g Zn/100 U insulin, preferably 10 to 26 ? [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:14 am
Dollars (Photo credit: 401(K) 2013) Y is for Year-End Bonus. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:39 pm
M is for Medicare Payments. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
See G 2/92 [2], J 3/09 [3.5.2] and T 2495/11 [2.1-2]. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
For instance, if the payor spouse is required by his employer to contribute $30,000 per year towards his 401(k), should such money be included in that spouse's income in determining support? [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
Elérí Ípin, Ìbikeji Olódumarè, A-je-jù-Oògùn, Obìriti, A-p'ijó-ikú-da, Olúwa mi, A-to-i-ba-j'ayé, Òrò à-bi-kú-j'igbo, Olúwa mi, Ajiki, Ógégé a-gb'ayé-gún; Odúdú ti nídú orí emèrè;… [read post]
