Search for: "MATTER OF M A W AND K M W" Results 41 - 60 of 494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2013, 3:16 pm by Buce
  As K says:   [W]e are at minimum talking about two variables, not one – GDP as well as the interest rate. ... [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Plama: Reflections on the Jurisprudential Schism in the Application of Most-Favored-Nation Clauses to Matters of Dispute Settlement Jeremy K. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Thus “[w]e do not believe comment k was intended to provide nor should it provide all ethical drugs with blanket immunity from strict liability design defect claims. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
But you don’t really get a choice in the matter as the dividends keep coming and you’re forced to pay taxes on the income. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
But you don’t really get a choice in the matter as the dividends keep coming and you’re forced to pay taxes on the income. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:37 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Im vorangegangenen Einspruchs­verfahren wurde E12 verspätet eingereicht und letztlich während der mündlichen Verhandlung vor der Einspruchs­abteilung von dieser ins Verfahren zugelassen. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:42 pm by David Zaring
The thing to do is to outsource to Gibson Dunn: [W]e believe that little or no action will be taken during any shutdown on matters requiring action by SEC staff, including with respect to comment letters for IPOs or other securities offerings, M&A transactions or periodic filings, reviews of confidential treatment requests or no-action letters, review/no-review decisions and rulemaking actions. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Comment periods: in my limited experience, the party w/burden of proof gets opening and reply; surreply is typically not a matter of right. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Copyrightable subject matter/originality: Copyright Office treatment of yoga sequences—usually not w/in CSM. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the same way, decision T 240/04 [16.3] already stated as regards new claims not sufficiently connected to the subject-matter of the one previously filed: “In einer solchen Situation den neuen Antrag zuzulassen würde einem Patentinhaber praktisch die Möglichkeit geben, nach Belieben eine Zurückverweisung an die Erstinstanz zu erzwingen. [read post]