Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers" Results 41 - 60 of 21,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
 Three Reviews and several Parliamentary Committees later, it remains a matter of opinion whether the thousands of hours of labour that went into the Act have brought forth a swan or a turkey. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:20 am by Richard H. Pildes
The answer to all these questions lies in a 1983 Supreme Court decision, INS v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:16 am by Aditya Bamzai
The above hypothetical makes clear that there must be some separation-of-powers distinction between, on the one hand, the territories and D.C. and, on the other hand, the military system—not merely as a matter of geography, but as a matter of fundamental constitutional principle. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by Bret Cahn
Kohler lacked capacity when she executed her advanced directives (Matter of Goldfein v Kohler, 221 AD3d 500 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:45 am by Margo Schlanger
The plenary-power doctrine was born in 1889, in Chae Chan Ping v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 7:17 pm by Derek Muller
Most of the opinion is not essential to… Continue reading The post State power and the Term Limits v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:27 am by Steven M. Taber
Thus, there are at least three distinctions to be made between American Electric Power and North Carolina v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:44 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0578, 2010 MT 117, HERMAN GONZALES, FAWN LYONS, KEN LAUDATO, LAWRENCE WALKER, GARY MANSIKKA, GARY GALETTI, GREG WHITING, MARVIN KRONE, RICHARD BLACK, JIM KELLY, CHRIS SOUSLEY, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:16 am by Scott Bomboy
Circling back to Dean Chemerinsky’s argument is the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]