Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 41 - 60
of 53,750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2011, 4:48 am
What can be said usefully in 1,500 words on matter management systems? [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Hence, the board concludes that the requirements of R 99(1)(a) are met and thereby follows the jurisprudence established in decisions T 920/97 [1], T 475/07 [1.1] and T 1519/08 [2.1]). [2.2.3] Moreover, the board does not agree that the appeal proceedings should be stayed in view of decision T 445/08, pending as referral G 1/12. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 8:28 am
By Big Tent Democrat Markos writes another post attacking the Clinton campaign, nothing new there, but I found this part deeply ironic: So the Clinton campaign has graduated from saying that certain states don't matter, to saying certain voters don't matter, to now saying that the Democratic Party electorate doesn't matter. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
If any reader can shed some light on this matter, please do so.To download the whole decision, click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 11:01 am
This failure amounts to a substantial procedural violation requiring that the decision under appeal to be set aside and the case be remitted to the first instance (see T 278/00). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
I’m off for some R&R in the Aloha State, and if you can’t figure out where that is, you probably shouldn’t be reading this blog, although you can take some comfort from the fact that you’re probably in the desired demographic of Fox’s new comedy lineup. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
In this context, [opponent 2] made reference to R 43 and R 139. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
In our 2005 issue on marriage and child wellbeing, Paul R. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
In our 2005 issue on marriage and child wellbeing, Paul R. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GenderAndTheLawBlog/~4/b1KxAiOc8Jw" height="1" width="1"/> [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:22 pm
On May 14, Governor DeSantis (R, Bizarro-Land)'s stay at home order expired. [read post]
22 May 2010, 11:00 am
This was a matter for the grounds of appeal. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
For the same reasons, it has to be specified by the the party that raises it, such that its legal basis can be identified within the exhaustive list provided by A 112bis(2)(a)-(d) and R 104.This is well established in the case law; see inter alia R 4/08 [2.1], R 8/08 [1.2.3] and R 7/11 [2.1].[4] In the present case this condition has not been complied with.[4.1] As a matter of fact, it can be seen from the very wording of the petition for review… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:09 pm
I wouldn’t vote for either one. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
The TBA thus found that whilst the cited prior art appeared to anticipate the claimed subject matter (r. 2.2), anticipation requires that the prior art teaching must be reproducible by the skilled person (r. 2.3).The TBA accepted that if the reasoning of T 0990/96 were to be followed, the novelty of the claimed subject matter would have to be denied in view of the prior art (r. 3.5). [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:46 pm
It wasn’t until 1993 that the Court refined this test further in R. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
It is also the applicant who receives the EPO communications regarding the European patent application (see for example R 55, 56(1), first sentence, and (2), second sentence, R 58, R 60, R 65, R 69(1), R 70(2) and A 94(3) together with R 71). [9] The provisions of the EPC foresee a few exceptional situations where, apart from the applicant, a person other than the applicant (so-called “third party”) is involved as a party in… [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 9:26 am
But it doesn't matter how Terry McAuliffe feels. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:35 am
SAYUNCLE: Not sure why they’re called Media Matters since they mostly don’t matter. “But I find it funny that a group of shills paid money to write hit pieces on gun rights was headed up by a guy with armed body guards. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) gets active on copyright matters, signing a trio of letters related to piracy and Copyright Office matters; Karyn Temple leaves her post as Register of Copyrights at the Copyright Office; the Supreme Court decides Peters v. [read post]
