Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 41 - 60
of 41,924
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2024, 2:58 am
You Can Google This The dangers of politics at work are quite real, no matter how careful you are. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
“Label integrity matters, and when businesses try to get around the rules, they are at best-deceiving consumers, and at worst putting them at risk,” said Vincent Arbuckle, New Zealand Food Safety deputy director general. [read post]
The Indian Satellite Saga and Retaliation: Recognizing the Supreme Court of India’s Judgment Abroad?
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm
When rejecting the enforcement of the ICC award, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a minimum contacts analysis should be satisfied.[21] Notably, the Australian Federal Court did not consider the legality of investment under the applicable bilateral investment treaty and the validity of the arbitration agreement because, when determining sovereign immunity, Devas needed only to provide prima facie evidence that a valid arbitration agreement existed.[22] The US District… [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am
“I think that’s true of both sides of this matter,” Pearce said. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 9:11 am
Demonstrating your willingness to follow the rules can work in your favor during the legal process. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
The Act made no exception for spouses—or, for that matter, other family members. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Notably, the question of whether a claimant received a reasonable assurance of reemployment for the following academic year is a question of fact and, if the Board's findings in that regard are supported by substantial evidence, they will not be disturbed" (Matter of Gracy [Commissioner of Labor], 182 AD3d 871, 872 [3d Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Overacker [Churchville-Chili Cent. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Notably, the question of whether a claimant received a reasonable assurance of reemployment for the following academic year is a question of fact and, if the Board's findings in that regard are supported by substantial evidence, they will not be disturbed" (Matter of Gracy [Commissioner of Labor], 182 AD3d 871, 872 [3d Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Overacker [Churchville-Chili Cent. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 5:07 am
For one, it seems likely that the defense lawyer would have to relate some of the details observed on the video to the client as a matter of providing effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:19 pm
Dissatisfied with this ruling, the plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Donnelley & Sons Co. with Cybersecurity-Related Controls Violations (June 18, 2024), available at https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2024-75. [2] In the Matter of R.R. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm
With respect to the rest, guidance, incentives and policy measures would serve as the default rule (see Symposium essay HERE on the US NAP). [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am
By tradition, they do not do so, although the decision is a matter for each individual. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Those matters are for the trier of fact alone. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Those matters are for the trier of fact alone. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Those matters are for the trier of fact alone. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
“She had no knowledge of the actions of Tom Girardi or Girardi Keese regarding client matters or finances,” Borges said, noting that one judge already dismissed a suit against her because of “ZERO evidence” of her involvement in client matters. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:47 pm
The lawyer for the ACLU contended that its interest did not line up with that of Dollree Map, but it didn't matter. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:12 pm
In his view, Friday’s ruling “inflicts a needless, unwarranted, and crippling wound on modern evidence law,” which has generally permitted experts to disclose the information that was the basis for their opinions. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:00 pm
Friends, it is very bad and wrong for gov't officials to arrest people in retaliation for their speech, and yesterday the Supreme Court issued a deeply important ruling on what kinds of evidence can be used to prove up a retaliatory arrest claim. [read post]
