Search for: "MATTER OF T B"
Results 41 - 60
of 19,993
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 6:40 pm
§ 314.53(b)(1) that drug product patents may be listed if they claim the “drug product . . . that is described in the pending or approved NDA” (emphasis added). [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 10:29 am
” This omission of the phrase, “as it existed in 2013,” is not just a matter of semantics—it is significant because Rule 9792.9.1 was amended and the amended version is applicable to dates of injury on or after January 1, 2013, which includes applicant’s case. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
In Canada, nearly half of women and a third of men have experienced intimate partner violence and rates are on the rise.[1] What was once thought to be a private matter is now properly recognized for its widespread and intergenerational effects. [2] The issue before the court is not whether intimate partner violence exists. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Without examination of compliance with and enforcement of our rules and laws, we can’t instill the trust necessary for our markets to thrive. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:31 am
., Serial No. 90498154 (June 6, 2024) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
Finally, the Federal Circuit notes that “[b]ecause ‘encrypted communications’ and ‘program code’ are not being claimed here for the content they communication, they are not printed matter,” and thus, “[t]he inquiry stops there; if the claim element is not printed matter, we need not consider whether it has a functional or structural relation to its substrate. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:42 am
As a result, it takes consumers more cognitive processing power and time to get from point A to point B. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
“It ain’t over ‘til it’s over. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Turning to the arguments remaining before us, "[t]he scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor* had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use" (Matter of Hudson Val. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Turning to the arguments remaining before us, "[t]he scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor* had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use" (Matter of Hudson Val. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:48 am
And don’t do it without the assistance of competent legal counsel! [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
The new statutory presumption didn’t say how much contact should happen, in fact it didn’t even mention ‘contact’, preferring instead the very flexible concept of ‘involvement’, which could embrace direct or indirect contact or even potentially involvement in decision making without any contact at all (i.e. the grant or exercise of PR). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
They can’t even agree what to call the Convention, much less its scope—should it address only core cybercrime, or any crime committed using technology? [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
See some examples below: Examples While this isn’t an exhaustive list, some examples of unsafe storage of a firearm could include: You leave a firearm, knife or another weapon as classified in section 86 on an accessible surface such as a car seat, glovebox, kitchen countertop, on a bed, etc. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 6:47 pm
Gibbs & Allyson B. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
Both (A) and (B).D. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:33 am
” In the matter where those words were uttered their father had dementia that foreclosed any power on his part to respond. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Didn’t matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
P. 60(b)(2). 4 decisions. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
P. 60(b)(2). 4 decisions. [read post]
