Search for: "MATTER OF T J H" Results 41 - 60 of 1,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing the decision in Matter of Marsteller, 217 AD3d 543, the Appellate Division said "(t)he affirmation of Eric J. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:37 am
Long will be unable to pursue an H-1B visa for over a year's time. [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am by Roel van Woudenberg
With a further letter dated 10 November 2020, the patent proprietor clarified its requests and submitted sets of claims G-J and G'-I'.XIII. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
The BoA concludes that indeed such a delay can be considered a substantial procedural violation (in line with T 823/11 but deviating from T 1824/15). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
If a person is a professional representative, then his/her employment status simply should not matter. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am by Nico Cordes
Hätte die Kammer das zum Ausdruck bringen wollen, hätte sie "does not" statt "may not" geschrieben.Der Wesentlichkeitstest wurde in der Folge oft angewandt und fand auch in jüngerer Zeit noch manchmal Verwendung. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 2:37 am
The Lawyer reports: One silk at a top five chambers says: "It's amazing that Peter Smith J hasn't simply resigned. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
According to those features, the full strand and the empty strand are arranged in a common horizontal plane and are arranged behind one another in the longitudinal direction of the storage device.Moreover, the storage device according to claim 1 differs from the one of D2 by a second group of distinguishing features (hereinafter: “second group of features”), according to which – according to feature [i] - to each layer of the full strand is allocated a corresponding layer of the… [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bernstein (moderator) Richard J. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 See G 2/92 [2], J 3/09 [3.5.2] and T 2495/11 [2.1-2]. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:52 am
" Turning to the Restatement (Second) of Agency, the Board looked at:[T]he following matters of fact, among others, are considered: (a) the extent of control which, by the agreement, the master may exercise over the details of the work; (b) whether or not the one employed is engaged in a distinct occupation or business; (c) the kind of occupation, with reference to whether, in the locality, the work is usually done under the direction of the employer or by a… [read post]