Search for: "MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JOHNSON T" Results 41 - 60 of 492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2022, 5:01 am by Ben Johnson
The Court will often instruct parties to brief questions that aren't in the petition (e.g. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 8:59 am by Russell Knight
Johnson, 98 Ill. 2d 166, 172 (1983) To prove that the service wasn’t in accordance with the law’s requirements, the person who allegedly served the Respondent must be questioned as to the details of the service. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Johnson & Johnson, -- S.E.2d ----, 2010 WL 4709084 (W.Va.) [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States (2016) (holding Johnson retroactive); 2016 Judicial Business Report – District Courts (observing that “prisoner petitions jumped 197 percent (up 19,588 to 29,546 petitions) as motions to vacate sentences rose 350 percent (up 19,317 to 24,837 petitions)”); 2016 Judicial Business Report – Courts of Appeals (attributing 188-percent increase in original proceedings in courts of appeals to requests for leave to file successive… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
”Discussion of the matter continued and the probate court once more reiterated that “[t]itle to property is not within my jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:50 am
” question matters to all of us, the “how did they get there? [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:01 am by Ben Johnson
[No matter how the case got there, the Court had to decide the whole thing.] [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 2:54 pm
Justice Johnson did not participate. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Rory Little
  This too is a somewhat complex point, but it seems certain that the Court’s analysis here – that Welch may properly seek review of the Eleventh Circuit’s denial of such a certificate even though his district court habeas petition did not raise the Johnson issue (which it couldn’t do, because the Court had not yet decided Johnson) – will be pleasing to habeas corpus advocates. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:19 pm by Robert McKennon
A spokeswoman for Pfizer said, “We believe that this matter was correctly decided by the lower courts and will file our opposition to the petition later this summer. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:35 am by Don Cruse
” Its concluding footnote observes that, given the public concern reflected in amicus briefs, “[t]his is a matter the Legislature could address. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:01 am
Johnson (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 1155, 1161-1162; see People v. [read post]