Search for: "MCLAREN MACOMB" Results 41 - 60 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 , the Board found that confidentiality and nondisparagement restrictions in severance agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
On March 22, 2023 Jennifer Abruzzo, General Counsel (“GC”) of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) issued a memorandum intended to assist the Regions in responding to inquiries regarding the Board decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Katherine Witherspoon Fry, Esq.
” In McLaren Macomb, the NLRB found that asking an employee to agree to keep terms of an agreement confidential (even with exceptions for spouses, lawyers, and tax advisors, and as ordered by a court or agency) violated the NLRA because the former employee would be unable to discuss it with current employees, who might want to organize. [read post]
As we recently reported, the Board’s recent decision in McLaren Macomb (2023) prohibiting, among other things, confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in severance agreements is a timely reminder of the Biden Board’s renewed emphasis on employee rights. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:00 am by Cary Reid Burke and Alex Meier
The Board sent shockwaves through employment law in its February 21, 2023, decision in McLaren Macomb, which held that simply offering a draft settlement agreement with broad confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions violated the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:50 am by Maja Hartzell and Robert Horton
The Decision In McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023), the NLRB ruled that McLaren Macomb Hospital violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by offering to non-supervisor employees being permanently furloughed severance agreements that broadly prohibited the employees from making statements that could disparage or harm the image of the hospital and prohibited them from disclosing the terms of the agreement. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 10:32 am by help@sandbergphoenix.com
In late February, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a groundbreaking decision in a case titled McLaren Macomb that calls into question the use of confidentiality and non-disparagement terms in, among other things, severance agreements and employment handbooks. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:40 am by Epstein Becker Green
NLRB Cracks Down on Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Provisions in Severance Agreements The NLRB held in McLaren Macomb that it is an unfair labor practice for employers to include non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:06 am by Daniel Jin
In McLaren Macomb, the NLRB found a severance agreement to be “unlawful” based on its inclusion of what the NLRB considered to be overly-broad confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:34 am by Maribeth Meluch
The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) has recently decided in McLaren Macomb and Local 40 RN Staff Council, that the mere proffer of a severance agreement without more, that contains provisions which on their face alone the Board could interpret to interfere with employees’ rights under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, is an unlawful labor practice. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:21 am by James W. Ward
In McLaren, an employer offered severance agreements to some employees who were furloughed. [read post]