Search for: "MISTER v. THE STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2010, 5:39 pm
Helfend v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:13 am
"or "Mister," or in conjunction with "Blend" and its logo was very different that what Starbucks used. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 10:14 am
Ogletree, Jr., All Deliberate Speed: Reflections on the First Half-Century of Brown v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 am
Daniel Barnett’s regular news alert brought the case of Aberdeen City Council v McNeill to my attention. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:29 am
And three of the foregoing files listed the name of Hunt's business, Mister Appliance. . . . [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
The first case he discussed was Murray v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:00 am
The Third Circuit decision I referred to above is Shubert v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:15 pm
Category: Civil Procedure By: Eric Paul Smith, ContributorTitleMicrosoft Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am
This post discussed Sawaf v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
”3 And some states, such as Massachusetts, explicitly noted in their subsequent copyright acts that the “legal security of the fruits of [a person’s] study and industry … is one of the natural rights of all men. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
The minority opinion of Mister Justice Brown focusing on public policy would seem to be sounder.) [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm
The decision to make Sweden Protestant was made during the state council (riksråd) in Västerås in 1527. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
See Kerzner Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
On the patent side of the house, patent law is still in a state of (what I hope is) temporary insanity (at least I hope it’s temporary) about section 101 (patent subject matter) eligibility and the definition of “abstract idea” and other silly things. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Mukasey, Diallo v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:03 am
In Ferrer v. [read post]
