Search for: "MOTION SYSTEMS V BUSH" Results 41 - 60 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2007, 3:02 pm
Bush, Circuit docket 05-5062, and Al Odah v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:56 pm
Bush, et al., docket 06-1725). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:33 am
It points out that the options remaining to try to regain integrity in the system depend upon a few cases yet pending: The two categories of cases not targeted for dismissal in the United States' instant motion to dismiss are those brought against governmental entities (Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc v Bush, No C 07-0109; Center for Constitutional Rights v Bush, No C 07-1115; Guzzi v Bush, No C 06-6225; Shubert… [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm by WIMS
" On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court granted summary judgment to the Forest Service. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:43 am by BDG
"    Even the litigation's defenders agree that the suits have no chance of success without a "Bush v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 12:28 pm by Ross Dannenberg
 Time will tell.One other interesting issue is how this might affect the EA v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 10:25 pm by Aaron Feigelson
It’s not an understatement to say that the NTP v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:19 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Repeat.Psychologists met in secret with Bush officials to help justify torture: reportConrad Black loses bid to have Supreme Court of Canada hear case over millions in back taxesB.C. teachers lose latest court fight on class size, compositionTen shocking details from the report on sexual misconduct in Canada's militaryExpert witnesses need not be independent, Supreme Court rulesProvince defends right to lay polygamy charge in Bountiful caseObese Canadians should be granted legal… [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:31 pm by Dawinder "Dave" S. Sidhu
  One can contrast Estrada’s reaction to that of Neal Katyal, who, after being successful in Hamdan, said: I don't think that this [decision] is a rebuke to the Bush administration per se…. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:31 pm
  The rulng was issued in Basardh v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
The government moved to dismiss the case, and Judge Richard Mark Gergel granted the motion. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm by Josh Blackman
Barely forty-eight hours later, the panel issued a per curiam opinion that denied the emergency motion for a stay pending appeal. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
James Cannell argued that under the test established in Boumediene v. [read post]