Search for: "MR. R. JACKSON" Results 41 - 60 of 809
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2020, 3:07 am
It's pretty awful to go on TV and comment on a speech that you wrote as if you were just hearing it.Here's the NYT article from yesterday that made the disclosure of Meacham's speechwriting role: "Helping to Shape the Words of the President-Elect: A Presidential Historian/Jon Meacham, best known for writing about past presidents like Andrew Jackson and George Bush, has helped shape some of Joseph R. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Jackson from speaking about them (which is certainly not a narrowly tailored request) before a jury has determined that Mr. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: NASHEL : : : : : Jose J. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:04 am by Dan Filler
Department of Justice’s National Advocacy Center and Fort Jackson, the U. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 8:23 am by Simon Lester
This is a guest post from Akhil Raina* & Mattijs Kempynck** Introduction Readers of this blog are all too aware of the many ways in which the United States (US) is rocking the multilateral trade boat: the Appellate Body (AB) is in crisis;  there’s an ongoing “trade war” with China; and the US supports[1] a dangerously broad interpretation of the ‘national security’ exception under GATT Art. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark In the following guest post, John Reed Stark takes a closer look at President Donald Trump’s recent Twitter tirade against cryptocurrency and lays out a roadmap for the President to follow if his administration were to crack down on cryptocurrency. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Dame Victoria Sharp, sitting at the Old Bailey with Mr Justice Warby, found Mr Yaxley-Lennon in contempt, by livestreaming the video from outside the public entrance to the court and by “aggressively confronting and filming” some of the defendants. [read post]