Search for: "MULCAIRE v. MULCAIRE"
Results 41 - 60
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
This argument was given short shrift by Lord Neuberger who said that, in his opinion, it was wrong [73] and was not supported by the Strasbourg jurisprudence [74] Lord Neuberger’s conclusions were as follows: i) Much of the information on the voicemail messages of the claimants which have been intercepted by Mr Mulcaire is likely to have been ‘commercial information or other intellectual property’ within section 72(5); ii) Although some of the information was not… [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
On 17 November 2010, Mann J held that Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on the PSI ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
Starting on Tuesday 8 May 2012 in front of Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson is the hearing of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:02 am
The recent decision of the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) in the conjoined phone hacking cases of (i) Coogan and (ii) Phillips v News Group Newspapers and Mulcaire [2012] EWCA Civ 48 has already been commented on by fellow blogs IPKat (here) and NIPC Law (here). [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 5:30 am
The phone hacking scandal may be bigger than we thought – Brian Cathcart If a Bulger killer was hacked, how did Mulcaire get his top secret number? [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:11 am
Application by Guardian & Various Claimants v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
Bloomberg has a report on potential ramifications: US prosecutors may be interested and “the presence of the U.S. phone numbers in [Glenn] Mulcaire’s notes also may complicate the company’s effort there to contain lawsuits“. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
There are a number of resolved complaints since last week, including the Met Office v The Daily Telegraph (over the accuracy of claims about the Met’s ability to predict the weather); Richard Ottaway MP v The Daily Telegraph (clause 1, accuracy) and the British Association of Social Workers v Community Care (clause 1, accuracy). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am
More Hacking And finally, because no roundup would be complete without an update on the phone-hacking scandal, the Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal to Mr Glenn Mulcaire in the voicemail interception case of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:43 pm
Glenn Mulcaire v News Group Newspapers The facts Mr Mulcaire was employed by NGN as a private investigator between 2002 and 2007. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:56 am
On 1 February 2012, in their judgment in the case of Coogan and Phillips v NGN and Mulcaire ([2012] EWCA Civ 48) the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination in refusing to answer questions put to him by the two claimants. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:39 am
The Supreme Court has today announced that it has granted permission to appeal to Mr Glenn Mulcaire in the voicemail interception case of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
Of these, 1,578 appear in Mulcaire’s 11,000 pages of notes. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
Therefore, the MR concluded (at para 83): Accordingly, I would dismiss these appeals, as: i) Much of the information on the voicemail messages of the claimants which have been intercepted by Mr Mulcaire is likely to have been 'commercial information or other intellectual property' within section 72(5); ii) Although some of the information was not 'commercial information or other intellectual property', and, in Ms Phillips's case, the confidence may have been that… [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:05 am
This post first appeared on Inforrm’s Blog and is reproduced here with permission and thanks Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Metropolitan Police succeed in G20 “kettling” appeal R (Associated Newspapers) v Lord Justice Leveson: Challenge to Anonymity Ruling Dismissed “Would Judges like to be told to eff off in court? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The appeals by Glenn Mulcaire were dismissed. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:19 am
“The Court of Appeal today (1 February) dismissed Mr Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against an order that he provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
Coogan and Philips v News Group Newspapers [2012] EWCA Civ 48 -read judgment The Court of Appeal today dismissed Mr Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against an order that he provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
Mr Mulcaire appealed against both orders and the appeals were heard together. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
