Search for: "Maine State Housing Authority v. Miller" Results 41 - 60 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As I argued in my last column, the requirement of popular approval may be analogized to the requirement of bicameralism; just as one house of the state legislature may not repeal text—whether or not the repeal changes the present-day operative effect of that text—without the other house, neither may the two houses accomplish repeal of initiatives or state constitutional provisions without involving the people. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Together with Opinions in the Cases Decided at January Term, 1837, Arising on the Restraints on the Powers of the States (1837) Samuel Freeman Miller, Lectures on the Constitution of the United States (1891) William H. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am by INFORRM
While in most cases it will be a media defendant who wishes to rely on the defence, there is Privy Council authority to the effect that the privilege can be asserted by a non-media defendant (Seaga v Harper [2008] UKPC 9). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Here is the exact,operative language from the statute: “(2) A mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agentshall contact the borrower in person or by telephone in order to assess the borrower’sfinancial situation and explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Initially, she served as Associate White House Counsel. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The proposed settlement was entered into under the authority granted EPA in Section 122(h) of CERCLA, and requires the Respondents to pay $600,000.00 to the Hazardous Substances Superfund in settlement of past costs. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
The actual number that occurred is probably much higher because E. coli O157:H7 infections did not become a reportable disease (required to be reported to public health authorities) until 1987 (Keene et al., 1991 p. 60, 73). [read post]